Filed under: Uncategorized
As predicted I was reticent to jump into the fray on the phone call. It was just too intimidating. I did appreciate the professional facilitation of The Rev. Eric H. F. Law of the Kaleidoscope Institute. Another member of the group and I were assigned to come up with something useful to say to the Archbishop about basic human dignity. My initial thoughts:
I think I have to ruminate for a moment why basic human dignity is germane to the discussion. In my mind “dignity” evokes the words of the baptismal covenant. I cannot get away from the imperative in those vows. The promises my godparents made for me (I was baptized in 1976) and which I reaffirm at several opportunities annually are not optional observances. Any question as to why I do ministry in Christ’s name is answered by those promises. I would like to convey to the Archbishop that it is not out of any political agenda, or elitism, or economic opportunity, or any other related motivation that I feel compelled to call the church to full inclusion. Rather it is out of the bonds of covenant and conviction of the gospel that I can do nothing else. My “story” would discuss the way in which the church’s hypocrisy in its treatment of LGBT people has translated into silent complicity in the abuse and neglect of young people. The teachings of the church are consisently held up in my community as a defense each time a young person is thrown out of his or her home when his or her sexuality is discovered. These are not radical agitators attempting to overthrow the quiet order of our rural community. They’re just young people trying to come to grips with their God-given selves. If the church could “come out” on their side, so much pain and loss would be healed, and further losses prevented.
2 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Beautifully put, Michael. I’m sure you will add much individuality to the discussion. As a lobbyist, I know personal reflections and experiences are priceless. That’s what you bring to this discussion.
Comment by Rebecca Fussman July 7, 2009 @ 12:33 pmA couple of years ago I had a conversation with another Christian Formation Director about the struggle that our church was contending with in the wake of Gene Robinson’s election and consecration. Her point was that the struggle caused so much stress and unrest that people were were leaving. She also felt that folks sitting on the margins were disgusted with the infighting. She didn’t think it was worth it. But I agree with you. I haven’t always had the language at hand to express what I believe but your comment about “silent complicity” is helpful to me. So is Elizabeth’s comment, back in my first year of EfM, when we were talking about “church politics” in a negative sense. She suggested that we reframe our thinking to consider that maybe the struggle was like labor, (birthing), and that maybe the strain and sweat and pain and even trauma is worthwhile.
My heart is also heavy for the latest young person who was thrown out of his home by his parents. I hope our church will take some further steps, during GC, towards inclusion and welcome and affirmation.
Peace!
Comment by Kris Forsyth July 8, 2009 @ 8:56 pm